A Nightmare on Elm Street Review

A Nightmare on Elm StreetWith Michael Bay’s Platinum Dunes rolling through reboots of horror franchises like Friday the 13th and Texas Chainsaw Massacre, it was only a matter of time before the production company focused a remake on Freddy Krueger.

Though it’s not saying much, Samuel Bayer’s A Nightmare on Elm Street is better than those three, a startling slasher that pays enough homage to the original and scares up enough fresh material to satisfy horror purists and newcomers alike.

As a “re-imagining” of Wes Craven’s 1984 classic, Bayer borrows a few familiar sequences, such as the trio of creepy kids playing jump rope and the clawed hand of Krueger emerging in a soapy bath between the legs of a sleep-deprived protagonist.

Like the first, Nancy (played by Rooney Mara) leads a group of teenagers who discover they share a recurring nightmare of a mysterious figure with knives for hands and a catchy theme song.  No one fesses up when Dean (Kellan Lutz) looks like Hell in the local diner, but soon they come to realize someone, or something, is terrorizing them while they dream.

Nancy trades concerned lines with her mother (Connie Britton) and plays off the perpetually pained expression of her classmate flame, Quentin (Kyle Gallner) while Kris (Katie Cassidy) and Jesse (Thomas Dekker) try their lids at the brilliant plan “don’t fall asleep!”

After eight installments featuring Robert Englund as the iconic Freddy Krueger, Jackie Earle Haley confidently dons the fedora and striped sweater to stalk the sleeping and deliver his own brand of one-liner humor.  Freddy KruegerAdvancements in make-up and special effects render his scarring more grotesque, but there’s enough Haley underneath to get a sense of his smirking, growling rendition of the character.

While Englund’s frightening killer was more playful with his prey, Haley’s Krueger is darker and angrier in the context of his origins.  The film fleshes out his story more through flashbacks, depicting a mop-haired Fred developing a relationship with the neighborhood pre-schoolers before venturing into the chilling darkness of a highly inappropriate realm.  When the town learns of his extra-curricular activities, Krueger is cornered in an abandoned building and burned alive.  Years later he haunts those children who banished him to the nightmare.

While Bayer overuses the sudden screech technique for easy jumps, his film contains some legitimate scares among the more disturbing material.  It’s also the bloodiest of all the remakes, drenching its kill scenes in spurting crimson from Freddy’s slashing hand.  The transitions from awake to asleep are smooth, especially as the characters grow less aware of what’s real and what’s imagined, which draws the audience into the uneasiness.

2010′s A Nightmare on Elm Street is shocking and scary.  It’s a shame it will forever be compared to Craven’s classic.

3.5 out of 5.

Update: I realized Platinum Dunes didn’t do Halloween, but you get the point. I apologize for the confusion.

SHARE THIS POST

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Myspace
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Stumnleupon
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • http://twitter.com/RickAfterDark Rick_After_Dark

    Just got back from a screening and I couldn't possibly disagree more. The film is wretched; it's poorly acted, sluggish and not scary at all. The Freddy makeup leaves Haley with no expression and he looks so weak he'd have trouble beating up Mini-Me. Bayer has no clue how to handle the transitions between the real and dream worlds, and no idea how to ramp up tension or suspense. It's a travesty, even worse than the other Platinum Dunes flicks.

  • Jeff Leins

    Poorly acted? Sluggish? Did you see the original?

  • Edward

    I saw the screening too! AMAZING MOVIE!!!!!!!! Fantastic!!! Might even be better than the original! Jackie is amazing

  • irishjohn

    I dont know what to believe i am seeing it on friday.. a travesty rick really?

  • irishjohn

    a travesty really rick?i have high hopes for this one

  • aidan05

    Hate to say it, but I have to agree with Rick. This film had no tension or suspense whatsoever. The deaths were not interesting and I just truly didn't care about anyone in the film.

    I did think that Haley was inspired at Freddy, but his character wasn't allowed to do anything meaningful. Quick, loud cuts for jumps don't equate to horror.

    [SPOILERS:] There were a lot of details in this film that were completely ignored, too. Why is everyone driving really nice cars and living in really big houses, with mediocre jobs? How did Nancy's mom get home from London so fast? Why were the parents suddenly so incompetent, if they were willing to kill a man brutally just 10-12 years before? Why was Freddy all of a sudden back and prevalent now? Why didn't the authorities investigate an entire building EXPLODING? How did Nancy's boyfriend fall asleep while swimming? How did he not die from being sliced, stabbed, and beaten? How come Nancy's screams woke him up when being beaten and screamed at didn't wake up the girls? Why the knife hands, where did that glove come from? Why attack the kids and not the parents?

    Any time I can come up with that many questions a day after seeing a movie means my suspension of disbelief is gone and the movie therefore failed. Granted, some of those were problems or questions in the original, but you aren't supposed to remake a movie if you can't make the original better. Platinum Dunes has done nothing but make boatloads of cash on the franchise name of the movie and not merit, and this film is no different.

    There are tons of avenues to explore that they didn't. You have the entire dreamscape to use, but instead, we get quick stabs and cliche scenes (hiding in a closet, really?).

    Needless to say, I was disappointed.

  • Jeff Leins

    I agree with you that loud noises don't equal horror. That bothered me the most about the remake. I think you'll find David's review is more in line with your take on it:
    http://www.newsinfilm.com/2010/04/30/counterpoi

  • aidan05

    You're right, I didn't see his review until you mentioned it, and it is definitely closer to my experience with the film.

    I do agree that this is better than the recent string of horror remakes and direct-to-video-worthy sequels, but I was hoping for something special.

    I guess I can hope for a sequel that can do more than this, and start to live up to the character's potential (and Haley returns to the role).

  • http://www.blog-alot.com Stevie

    Very good film. I'd recommend this to anyone

  • http://www.blog-alot.com Stevie

    Very good film. I'd recommend this to anyone