<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;For Your Consideration&#8217; Ads Get Desperate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsinfilm.com/2009/11/29/for-your-consideration-ads-get-desperate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsinfilm.com/2009/11/29/for-your-consideration-ads-get-desperate/</link>
	<description>The latest in movie news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:41:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeffleins</title>
		<link>http://www.newsinfilm.com/2009/11/29/for-your-consideration-ads-get-desperate/comment-page-1/#comment-2896</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffleins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsinfilm.com/?p=33293#comment-2896</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I saw 2012 but never got around to reviewing it.  The effects were abundant, but I wouldn&#039;t exactly call them great.  There&#039;s only so many times you can see destruction and crumbling buildings before it&#039;s hack.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree on Transformers and The Informant.  I liked Damon in the role and think he&#039;s a solid actor, but he&#039;s not going to contend in another strong year for &quot;best actor&quot; category.  Good call on the Golden Globes though.  It could be considered a &quot;musical or comedy&quot; performance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought it was a thin year for Oscars too, but I&#039;ve been keeping up with some of the predictions at the Oscar blogs and it seems like a crowded year.  I think its because there&#039;s still a few weeks before things really kick into gear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve heard a lot about Up in the Air (and I read the script) and it&#039;s all overwhelming positive.  Heaps and heaps of praise.  People are saying Clooney over Day-Lewis, Reitman picking up screenplay and director nods, best picture nomination, etc.  Very very excited about finally seeing it soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I saw 2012 but never got around to reviewing it.  The effects were abundant, but I wouldn&#39;t exactly call them great.  There&#39;s only so many times you can see destruction and crumbling buildings before it&#39;s hack.</p>
<p>I agree on Transformers and The Informant.  I liked Damon in the role and think he&#39;s a solid actor, but he&#39;s not going to contend in another strong year for &#8220;best actor&#8221; category.  Good call on the Golden Globes though.  It could be considered a &#8220;musical or comedy&#8221; performance.</p>
<p>I thought it was a thin year for Oscars too, but I&#39;ve been keeping up with some of the predictions at the Oscar blogs and it seems like a crowded year.  I think its because there&#39;s still a few weeks before things really kick into gear.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve heard a lot about Up in the Air (and I read the script) and it&#39;s all overwhelming positive.  Heaps and heaps of praise.  People are saying Clooney over Day-Lewis, Reitman picking up screenplay and director nods, best picture nomination, etc.  Very very excited about finally seeing it soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.newsinfilm.com/2009/11/29/for-your-consideration-ads-get-desperate/comment-page-1/#comment-2894</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsinfilm.com/?p=33293#comment-2894</guid>
		<description>haha...but seriously...2012 deserves an effects nod (did you even see it?), though the win should go to watchmen, star trek, or district 9 at this point.&lt;br&gt;and yes, transformers 2, even though i liked it, definitely doesn&#039;t deserve anything outside of technicals.  the informant shouldn&#039;t be considered for anything outside of maybe some technicals either, damon was good, but not best good...maybe golden globe nod good.  and i think sandler from funny people should be nominated for a golden globe.&lt;br&gt;and oddly enough, it does seem to be a thin oscar year.&lt;br&gt;even if lovely bones, invictus, avatar, up in the air (though i haven&#039;t heard much about this one) and even &#039;brothers&#039; all weigh in for oscar potential, that still leaves 5 slots.&lt;br&gt;i could see star trek, inglourious basterds, district 9, and MAYBE even harry potter filling those spots. i like the ten nominations.  and hopefully not the overrated &quot;up.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha&#8230;but seriously&#8230;2012 deserves an effects nod (did you even see it?), though the win should go to watchmen, star trek, or district 9 at this point.<br />and yes, transformers 2, even though i liked it, definitely doesn&#39;t deserve anything outside of technicals.  the informant shouldn&#39;t be considered for anything outside of maybe some technicals either, damon was good, but not best good&#8230;maybe golden globe nod good.  and i think sandler from funny people should be nominated for a golden globe.<br />and oddly enough, it does seem to be a thin oscar year.<br />even if lovely bones, invictus, avatar, up in the air (though i haven&#39;t heard much about this one) and even &#39;brothers&#39; all weigh in for oscar potential, that still leaves 5 slots.<br />i could see star trek, inglourious basterds, district 9, and MAYBE even harry potter filling those spots. i like the ten nominations.  and hopefully not the overrated &#8220;up.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
