News in Film
 
 
 

Where the Wild Things Are Review

Published by Jeff Leins on: October 12th, 2009

Where the Wild Things AreLike many of you reading this, I remember being read Maurice Sendak’s award-winning book as a child.  The sense of wonder in its 18-picture panels and enchantment in a ten-sentence fantasy reached an inner place where imagination blossomed and ran wild.

But nothing prepared me for Spike Jonze’s unique vision for Where the Wild Things Are, a moving experience unlike any other.  Told with vivid, breathtaking visuals, the story speaks to and captures the whimsy and childlike fury of adolescence.

Living in a modern single-parent home, the misunderstood Max is a bundle of energy and emotion.  He acts as a 9-year-old might: building forts, pretending the “floor is lava,” and pestering an older sibling for attention.  An exhausted mother (Catherine Keener) spends a tender moment with him, but when she later cozies to a boyfriend it sends Max into a temper tantrum and running away into the night.

Clad in a wolf costume and wearing a petulant scowl, Max thrashes about in the woods before stumbling onto an abandoned sailboat.  Re-enacting a make-believe session in his comfortable covers, he sets out on the rocky ocean away from the family he feels forgot him.

His adventure takes him to an island where he discovers (or imagines) seven monsters with unpredictable behavior and terrifying teeth.  It isn’t long before Max has convinced them to make him king of the Wild Things and promises to make them all happy.

“Let the wild rumpus start!” he yells, heralding the beginning of dancing, howling, dogpiling, dirt fighting, fort building, and general silliness.  Max especially bonds with Carol (voiced by James Gandolfini), a destructive outsider with a sweet, vulnerable center.  Where the Wild Things AreEach treats the other like a pet, but more importantly a friend who understands the other’s isolation.  Though he plays favorites, there’s a piece of Max in all of them and he’s able to learn the responsibilities and frustrations of family harmony.

The Wild Things are accomplished with 9-foot suits, stellar voice work, and CGI-rendered faces that allow for such touching interaction between the child and his inventions.  But Max Records delivers an amazing performance for such a young actor and its his authentic expressions that anchor the surreal.

Jonze’s use of hand-held cameras and waist-high perspective make the encounters more intimate, and the ever-changing mood rises and falls with the melodies of an innocent soundtrack by Karen O. from the Yeah Yeah Yeahs.

Though it’s PG, the wonderful film may be lost on those younger than Max.  The rambunctious Wild Things may be too rowdy and the mellow pacing too grown up for children who will no doubt be squirming by the time Max’s homesickness settles in.  Where the Wild Things Are is for the kid in all of us, but it may not be for all kids.

4.5 out of 5.

  • enelson56
    I saw this movie last night with my six year old son and it was horrible. The characters where depressing and angry. The story was not easy for those under 14 to follow with all of the emotional battles they were facing. Too emotionally violent and angry. The movie had great effects and was visually appealing, but that's it. I would have left early and asked for my money back had it not been a free ticket.
  • coastgoon
    i personally thought it was as perfect as i imagined it would be...
    sure, the overall feel was dark and troubled but it addressed problems that older people would understand, which is fitting considering the audience that was introduced to this, back in the day, are grown now. everyone i've asked loves it.. bottom line
  • lisa_wrap
    Here's an interesting piece on how Warner Bros. is trying to sell WTWTA to both kids and adults: http://www.thewrap.com/article/where-wild-thing...
  • jeffleins
    Great read. Thanks!
  • graemesutherland
    i so wanted to see this film , having owned the book many years ago , i have to say i found the film a bit of a let down , a little bit too intense , about a childs anger , each monster having a bit of maxs problems , the film is not for children , its for 44 year olds like myself , that remember that monsters are not all that bad , when you gaze at the book , the monster in the film are very much like in the book , looking at them you just want to cuddle them , until that is they talk and bore us all silly , this film could have been so good ,, the effects spot on , the monsters spot on , the story weak .... but i did not care , as it brought all my childhood back to me , , dont take you child to watch this film , buy the book , and you go see it ,if your over 40 that is , have to say the music was stunning , and that made the film for me ,, my rating for this film is ... if your a child 1 out of 5 . if your over 40 and you had the book 4 out of 5 ,soundtrack 5 out of 5 , ,
  • graemesutherland
    saying that , i have this urge to watch this film over and over again ...so i may upgade it in the very near future ...
blog comments powered by Disqus