News in Film
 
 
 

Inglourious Basterds Review

Published by Rene Gauthreaux on August 24, 2009

Inglourious BasterdsViewing a Quentin Tarantino film is a bit like riding a Ferris wheel at a traveling carnival; it has been fun up to this point in your life but you are not sure when the guy managing the ride is going to screw up and you will be terribly disappointed (or mangled in a tragic accident). I am a huge fan of Tarantino yet each time he releases a film I fear that this may be the one I do not like (or more importantly the film where he loses sight of the unique visions that have made him so enjoyable for these past 15 or so years). It is my great pleasure to report that the score is now 6 for 6 as a director with his latest romp— Inglourious Basterds.

From the trailer you may be expecting it to be mainly about the core group of ‘basterds’ with some possible back stories to show how each got to their place (which is rumored to show up in a prequel) and while they do play a tertiary role I did not feel like we got to know the Nazi killing posse the way we do with two main characters. The group consists of a mix of well known (Brad Pitt, Eli Roth) to relative newcomers (B.J. Novak, Til Schweiger) that are on a secret mission to kill and scalp as many Nazis as possible which they do with gusto. I wish there was more to say about this group because I feel like they deserved more screen time.

The first we are introduced to is Christoph Waltz as Colonel Hans “Jew Hunter” Landa. While his performance is memorable and clearly award worthy I found my self wondering why this role did not go to Tim Roth as it almost seemed like Waltz studied Roth’s mannerisms, speech pattern and expressions as an actor and mimicked him perfectly for the role (down to the laugh). In fact he did this almost so well that at one point (knowing full well that it was Waltz and not Roth) I began doubting myself and wondered if Roth had just aged since I last saw him in The Incredible Hulk.

Christopher WaltzI can understand that in interest of historical accuracy Waltz was added as an authentic German (even though he is Austrian) but it just made me miss Roth and was, for me, a big distraction. In Waltz’s defense he definitely is a scene-stealer and dances through the film like he the lead role in a musical. His delivery of lines is very lyrical and each minor action seems carefully acted.

Mélanie Laurent as Shosanna Dreyfus (later rechristened as Emmanuelle Mimieux) — who Landa allows to escape in the opening chapter — returns as our protagonist with a plot that presents her with the ability to enact revenge on Landa for crimes committed against her family (a similar theme that ran through Kill Bill). Laurent did not come across as violent or explosive as females tend to do in previous Tarantino films but, like the Basterds, is bent on killing Nazis.  In a character’s heart revenge is a very personal vendetta, so in a way the evil forces win in this story.

The Tarantino trademarked pop-culture commentary (albeit from the 40’s) was present with dialogs regarding movies (which could have come from a conversation with Tarantino himself) and the small talk that peppers a Tarantino film, which makes it seem real and not scripted. This was particularly evident in the bar scene where the Basterds meet their double agent and end up playing a card game with an actual Nazi officer. Inglourious BasterdsCarefully placed musical cues and campy title frames reminder that you were in fact watching a Tarantino film, just in case you were confused by the lack of pimps and gangsters. But in case you missed them Tarantino alums Samuel Jackson and Harvey Keitel turn up as vocal narrators and a general via radio respectively.

Overall, a bloodier film than Kill Bill but in this one the violence is realistic and not over the top exaggerated (with spurting severed limbs) so there are a few cringe inducing moments. The death toll on screen was significantly higher than any other Tarantino film, but it is easy to look past this when it is the bad guy Nazis getting killed. As a little social experiment it was interesting to see the how the reactions of the audience to the Nazi deaths mimics the reactions of the viewers of the Nazi propaganda film when seeing US/British soldiers killed.

  • Name
    Actually his name is Christoph Waltz... And as much as I love Tim Roth in his roles I didn't miss him in this at all. Christoph Waltz was awesome. He even made me endure Brad Pitt.
  • chopper_1919
    I want to see this movie now, based on this review only. I have had problems with Tarantino in the past but am now ready to take the plunge.
  • rko
    No offense intended to the Taren-wagon, but the film seemed very poorly structured. As with most if not all Tarentino films, the story lacks any sort of subtext, and though it is accustom to like his films for the action and dialog, I didn't feel either of those hit the mark in this film.
    Without spoiling anything, which is quite hard to do in this case, the film seems to lack any sort of narrative, but rather strong style instead.
    It is a genre picture, based off Italian style genre films of the 60s/70s, but one major problem is that scenes are quite bumbled and never do what they build up to do. The opening scene, the dinner table scene with the theatre owner, and the German bar scene particularly leave you simply puzzled with a joke to boot.
    You can say that since the entire film is simply fictional, we don't have to bring rationality into the characters -- but if you can't even believe that specific characters would contain themselves in situations that have been built around them not doing it, what do you have?
    Overall it had its moments, but thinking back to those moments, I'm not sure if I found it interesting because the blatant in-your-face exaggeration, or simply because it was something different taking place getting me out of the drab.
    And I got to tell you, seeing all these posts about how great it was, and Brad Pitt being amazing, etc, etc. I don't think I saw the same movie these people did, some of the acting was great yes, but if anyone stole the show acting wise it was the Nazi hater and the Jew-Hunter -- they were simply the most convincing.
    The story and direction over all has a lot of holes that were not filled.
  • Jeff Leins
    I definitely see your point about the narrative, and I agree to a certain extent. To me the film was worth a watch and a recommendation, but I wouldn't consider it one of his best or a masterpiece of any kind.

    Christopher Waltz was exceptional though and Pitt was entertaining.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Recent Reviews